Global Resource & Information Directory

Guest blogger: Matthew Johnson

Matthew Johnson As Director of Education with MediaSmarts, Matthew leads the education program team in research, resource development and outreach.  A former teacher, Matthew is a nationally recognized expert on privacy, copyright and cyber security issues relating to youth.  MediaSmarts (formerly known as Media Awareness Network) is a Canadian not-for-profit centre for digital and media literacy.  Its vision is that young people have the critical thinking skills to engage with media as active and informed digital citizens.

Despite what many adults believe, privacy matters to youth.  More and more, though, youth are finding that their actions online are monitored – by parents, teachers, and corporations.  A high school principal creates a fake Facebook profile page and adds over 300 of her school’s students as friends; a Texas middle-school plans to introduce ID cards with microchips that its students will be required to carry at all times; an Indiana high school student is expelled after a profane tweet (sent in the middle of the night from the student’s home computer) alerts his school’s monitoring system.  While these are extreme examples, they show some of the ways that young people find their privacy compromised – often by the very same people who are urging them to be more conscious of their privacy.

15578CBUAs MediaSmarts’ study, Young Canadians in a Wired World, Phase III: Talking to Youth and Parents about Life Online, has shown, youth receive inconsistent messages about privacy.  On the one hand, youth are often told that they need to value and protect their privacy.  Parents and teachers tell students to be aware of the information they post online, whether on their social networking pages or when entering contests or filling out registration forms.  This personal information can be collected and sold to advertising companies and marketers for use in targeted advertising or corporate strategies, or can result in unwanted contact from strangers or lead to social embarrassment.  On the other hand, kids are told that their privacy needs to be compromised for their own protection: parents feel pressured to monitor their children because they’ve heard about the (exaggerated) dangers of Internet predators, while schools monitor online activity to attempt to prevent access to inappropriate content or because they’re worried about cyberbullying.

In addition to these confusing messages about privacy, surveillance online is simply a reality for youth today.  While youth feel that the surveillance they’re subject to is annoying (and often useless), they have received the same mistaken messages about stranger danger and Internet risks and as a result have bought into the idea that they must be monitored to keep them safe online.  This surveillance – and young people’s acquiescence to it – is cause for concern.  Privacy is a fundamental human right, and constant surveillance chips away at our private space.  If youth grow up in an environment where surveillance is normal, they are less likely to resist future – and possibly more intrusive – developments in surveillance.  If youth learn, early on, that having their activities tracked and their behaviours monitored by a multitude of sources is normal, then they might not resist as more and more parts of their life come under the gaze of others.  Moreover, this constant surveillance robs kids of the chance to take risks, to experiment and to make mistakes – to grow, in other words, into independent adults.

Surveillance can also drive kids underground: many youth report that they often subvert, resist, or negotiate surveillance in a variety of ways.  For instance, youth use slang, code words or “in-group” references to send one message to peers and another to parents, move to social networks that permit greater degrees of anonymity or pseudonymity, and seek out alternative service providers if they’re uncomfortable with the amount of information a website wants to collect – or, if they can’t find an alternative, limit or falsify the information they post.

Students aren’t the only ones who criticize school surveillance: many teachers do as well.  When school filters block sites such as YouTube or web pages that contain certain key words, it’s frustrating for students and teachers alike.  Of course, there are pressures on schools too.  Schools and teachers need to balance their responsibilities to keep students safe and to provide a space for growth and development, both academically and socially.  Too often, though, safety means surveillance.  Instead of blocking entire sites, students should have the opportunity to browse, learn, and develop in a supportive environment where they have access to the opportunities that the Internet can provide, but also feel comfortable turning to an adult if there’s a potentially dangerous situation.  Rather than shutting down the computer – and the conversation – mistakes of this kind should be teachable moments, as they were for the teacher in our study whose students stumbled on a “cloaked” hate site without recognizing it.

D244750espite the numerous strategies that youth have devised to get around surveillance and maintain their own privacy, there are still a number of areas where kids can benefit from adult guidance.  For example, while youth are very concerned about their social privacy, they’re often not nearly as aware of how the corporate online spaces where they spend their time gather and profit from their personal information, and the means available for protecting their privacy in that context.  It’s also easy for kids – especially teens – to forget how permanent something posted on the Internet can be.  Once it’s up, it’s out of our control: even if we delete that nasty comment or embarrassing photo, we can’t be sure that others haven’t already seen it, or even saved it and distributed it further.  Teaching kids about privacy ethics and digital citizenship can help develop an understanding of how to act ethically online and avoid embarrassing or harming themselves and others with their online actions.

It’s important that youth have the agency to control their personal information.  By providing them with access to their own personal space, instead of monitoring them online (even if it’s usually done with the best of intentions), we’re giving them the space to experiment and develop ideas and identities.  Youth then have the chance to grow, develop, learn how to be autonomous, and cultivate mutually trusting relationships with their parents, teachers, and peers.

MediaSmarts features an extensive privacy section on its website, highlighting developments in privacy issues and surveillance online, as well as some of the Canadian legislation that deals with these issues.  You can find the section at: http://mediasmarts.ca/privacy  Privacy information and further resources can be found on GRID, within the Family Online Safety section.

Guest blogger: Alexandra Chernyavskaya

Alexandra ChernyavskayaAlexandra Chernyavskaya is the Head of Department for illegal internet content prevention and response at the Internet Association of Kazakhstan.  She joined the team in 2012 to take over the division of the Association dedicated to online safety, particularly the safety of children.  Alexandra has a degree in Psychology, a particular interest in Criminal and Forensic Psychology and experience in project management and social media.  She combines her academic knowledge with Internet-related experience to tackle Internet crimes within the Kazakhstani segment of the Internet.

***

Kazakhstan is a fast growing country and the usage of ICT grows ever more important.  Current penetration of the Internet in Kazakhstan is approximately 50%.  There are 49.5 Internet users per every 100 citizens of the country, whereas in 2008 there were only 15 users per every 100 citizens.  Such popularization led to an increase in the number of underage users.

Unfortunately, there are no official statistics for the exact number of young Internet users in Kazakhstan, but several popular local web sites provide numbers, which help to make an approximate estimation.  One of the most popular web sites within the Kazakhstani segment of the Internet has more than 5,400,000 unique visitors per month.  Users between the ages of 12 and 17 years amount to 7% of all users, including 5% of females and 2% of males.  It also has to be taken into account that Russian, European and American sites tend to be more popular among Kazakhstani users, so the underage audience of those sites may be well above 400,000 users.

The popularization of the Internet provides youngsters with a whole world of opportunities for communication, education, and leisure.  However, the Internet also provides the perfect environment for criminal activity directed at children and teenagers.  The Internet offers multiple opportunities: it is easily accessible to criminals and it lacks centralized and coordinated regulation.  In addition, it provides a level of anonymity that did not exist before.  As the popularity of the Internet among youngsters increases, the criminal activity directed at minors grows as well.  Although there is no solid evidence to suggest that these two phenomena are directly related, one can hardly deny the fact that sex offenders who target children actively use the Internet to find their victims.

According to data provided by the Committee of Legal Statistics and Special Accountancy of the General Prosecutor’s office of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the number of sex crimes against children under the age of 16 increased by 48% in 2011, and by a further 63% in 2012, reaching a total number of 232 cases.  In addition, 248 rape cases were registered in 2012. Knowing that official statistics generally under-represent the real state of things, it can be suspected that the actual numbers are higher.

Current legislation in the majority of countries is very clear about punishments for sex offenses against minors, but when it comes to similar offenses made online the legislation is not so unanimous.  A number of countries, including Australia, Canada, USA and Great Britain, introduced the concept of grooming into their legislation as well as punishment for it.  When it comes to such countries as the Russian Federation and Kazakhstan, legislation here does not stipulate for online offenses.  Due to this, online offenses remain unpunished.  The criminal can be apprehended only if they managed to take online grooming one step further and secure a meeting with a child in real life.  However, this usually turns out to be too late.

The Russian Federation has recently passed Federal Law 436,  “On the protection of children from information harmful to their health and development”.  Undeniably it limits the access of children to inappropriate information online, but it cannot protect them from sex offenses that originate on the Internet.  A similar draft law has been created in Kazakhstan as well.  It has been introduced to the Mazhilis (the lower house of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan) in the autumn of 2012.  Despite the importance of this law, it only covers the question of protection from inappropriate information and similarly to the Russian one does not cover the issue of online grooming and online sex offenses.

Portrait of a boy using laptop.

Recently, several measures for the protection of Internet users have been proposed within governmental bodies.  Last November, Deputy General Prosecutor Mr. Merkel proposed to add a chapter dedicated to cybercrime to the Criminal Code.  In accordance with this chapter, authors of the web sites containing information related to terrorism, pornography and suicide would be punished.  Mr. Merkel, however, mentioned that it would be difficult to apprehend the owners of illegal websites if they lived in a different country.  In addition, the General Prosecutor’s Offices recently proposed punishing those who provide hosting services for websites with illegal content.  However, despite these propositions no amendments to the legislation have been made so far.

When it comes to the responsibility of online community itself, measures for the protection of children are virtually absent within the Kazakhstani segment of the Internet. Namba.kz  and Nur.kz  are among the most popular Kazakhstani web sites that can be classified as social networks. Their terms and conditions clearly state that the administration of the website is not responsible for any content posted on the website and that they are not responsible for any possible moral harm or damage resulted from the usage of the website.  The terms of Nur.kz only mention that they have a right to delete illegal content.  None of the websites provide guidelines for those who encounter disturbing content.

As of today the underage online community in the territory of Kazakhstan remain unprotected, both while using local web resources and resources of other countries as well.  Whereas local legislation has boundaries, the Internet does not and online predators know this very well.  Currently the online safety of children lies within the hands of their parents or teachers who can closely monitor online activities.  However, there is a problem here as well.  The majority of parents and teachers simply do not have enough knowledge about the Internet because they were introduced to it a mere 10 – 15 years ago.  When it comes to the Internet they may be even less confident with it than their children.  As a result, the young generation of Kazakhstani citizens seems to be left alone on the Internet.

In order to amend the situation, a number of measures have to be adopted by governmental bodies, communities and individuals.  The speedy introduction of relevant legislation is one of the most important measures to be taken.  Cybercrime is often no different from the real life crime and it requires the same level of response.

In addition, it is vital to raise awareness among children, parents, teachers and the general community.  Once people learn to be vigilant while using the Internet, it will be much harder for criminals to catch them off-guard.  This can be done by means of seminars tailored for each group of users.  Through such specialized training, parents, guardians and teachers will be made aware of Internet dangers, they will be equipped with the necessary tools to protect their children and they will be taught to discuss the issues with them.

Community action has already become a powerful international tool for the prevention of cybercrime, especially against children.  Unfortunately, community participation and involvement remains relatively low in Kazakhstan.  In support of international community action, the illegal Internet content hotline was established in Kazakhstan two years ago.  Via the safekaznet.kz hotline users can report illegal content and thus contribute to its removal from the Kazakhstani segment of the Internet.  Currently the online protection of children is one of the foremost priorities of the hotline.

It has to be emphasized that there is a number of actions that can be taken to prevent cybercrime directed at children and adolescents, including control over the financial flows, the creation of specialized social networks for children only and the involvement of business and general community.  However, in such a young country as Kazakhstan we have to start from the very beginning and take the initials steps towards that direction first.  As soon as the foundation is built, we will be able to do much more.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.